Journal of Hospital Infection: Forced-Air Warming An Infection-Control "Hazard" in Implant Surgery

StopSurgicalInfections.org recently submitted a press release regarding a review article published by Journal of Hospital Infection.  The press release is as follows:

Surgical-infection experts have unambiguously concluded that forced-air warming “...does contaminate ultra-clean air ventilation….” in the operating room. Their advice: Use air-free warming during implant surgery.

PRLog - Nov. 12, 2014 - MINNEAPOLIS -- “Infection Control Hazards Associated with the Use of Forced-air Warming in Operating Theatres," appears in the scientific publication of the Healthcare Infection Society, Journal of Hospital Infection. The article, in press, can be found on-line at www.journalofhospitalinfection.com/article/S0195-6701%2814%2900245-X/abstract?showall=true=

The authors, including surgeon D.L. Leaper, chair of the committee that drafted the UK’s surgical-site infection guidelines, summarized the findings of 10 peer-reviewed, published studies regarding the infection risks of forced-air warming.  Their conclusions:

• No studies have shown that forced-air warming (“FAW”) reduces surgical infections—other than in colorectal surgery.
• In implant surgery, even minor contamination of the operative field can be catastrophic.
• FAW devices contaminate the operative field.

Patient Advocate Warns Against Forced-Air Warming

A well-known patient advocate now urges surgical patients to avoid forced-air warming—even to change hospitals if necessary.

The advocate, Rosie Bartel, speaks from experience. Infected with MRSA during a knee-replacement procedure at a hospital using forced-air warming, Bartel has undergone 27 subsequent operations— including amputation of her leg to the hip. The MRSA remains active.

After researching how the pathogens rose from the floor of the operating room into the sterile field, Bartel concluded that Bair Hugger warming blew particles into her wound, causing the MRSA infection. 

Bartel has a website (www.RosiesDream.com) to share her findings and give her advice to patients. Click on the video below. She has some powerful things to say.

A former educator, Bartel works closely with Partnership for Patients and the Institute for Healthcare Improvement. She will be co-chair of IHI’s national conference this year.

Infection Risk from Forced-air Warming Considered; Study on Bacterial Contamination Recommended

International Orthopedic Consensus 

“We recognize the theoretical risk posed by forced air warming blankets,” concluded the Consensus Statement recently released by the International Consensus on Periprosthetic Joint Infection.  While not urging a change in practice, the Consensus Statement recommended that further studies be undertaken regarding the safety of forced-air warming (“FAW”) in orthopedic implant surgery.
Delegates from more than 50 countries and 80 different societies met in August 2013 to evaluate scientific literature and identify areas for further research.  Among the other conclusions relating to periprosthetic joint infections and the risk of airborne contamination:
 
1. Airborne particulate bacteria are a major source of contamination in the operating room.  The number of airborne bacteria around the wound is correlated to the incidence of periprosthetic joint infections.  Bacteria “circulate through the operating room via air currents.”

“Legg et al,” the Consensus Statement noted, “found increased particles above the surgical site when using FAW compared to radiant warming.” To be precise, the Legg study, published in Bone & Joint Journal, found 2,000 times more contaminant particles in the air over the wound with Bair Hugger forced-air warming than with air-free HotDog conductive warming.  With HotDog patient warming, only 1,000 particles per cubic meter of air were present. With Bair Hugger warming, the particle count was 2,174,000 per cubic meter, an increase of 217,300%.

Nursing Journal: Forced-Air Warmers May Allow Pathogens to Contact Surgical Wounds

October 10, 2013

   

AORN Journal, noting concerns about infection risk from forced-air warmers, called for multi-center, randomized, controlled trials. Evidence of bacteria in the air-flow paths of forced-air warmers; authors ask manufacturers to consider redesign.

In a continuing-education review article in the October issue of AORN Journal, published by the Association of Operating Room Nurses, the authors examined 192 sources.  Their conclusions included the following:

• “Clinicians should take steps to prevent health care–associated infections from the use of forced-air warmers….”  Such steps include “routinely and meticulously” cleaning the devices.

•  Forced-air warmers may interrupt the flow of filtered air toward the area of the wound and may allow dust particles containing pathogenic organisms to come into contact with the wound.

•  Five separate studies suggested that forced-air warmers could be harboring bacteria or bacteria-containing particles.

Among the research considered by the authors was “Forced-air warming and ultra-clean ventilation do not mix: an investigation of theatre ventilation, patient warming and joint replacement infection in orthopaedics,” by UK orthopedic surgeon PD McGovern et al and published in the Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery.  The research included 1,437 patients undergoing hip or knee replacement.  The “Finding and comments” of the AORN Journal authors included:

“High risk of developing deep infections for subjects warmed with forced-air warming systems (odds ratio, 3.8; P=.024).”

Recent A & A study: “These findings warrant future research into the effects of forced air warming…during contamination-sensitive surgery.”

August 2013
 
Research in the August edition of Anesthesia & Analgesia, a publication of the International Anesthesia Research Society, and appearing under the name of the Anesthesia Patient Safety Foundation stated:

 “[F]orced air warming was found to establish convection currents that mobilized resident air from nonsterile areas (under the anesthesia drape) upward and into the surgical site.”

The clinical concern, according to the article, is that the convection currents created by Bair Hugger will mobilize contaminants and/or impede the ventilation systems’ ability to clear contaminants from the surgical site.  The concerns, they stated, “are most relevant for smaller airborne particles…such as free-floating bacteria and skin cell fragments.”

The study compared the impact of Bair Hugger warming with air-free HotDog conductive fabric warming.  No convective currents were detected when HotDog warming was applied.  In explanation, the scientists stated:

 “Because conductive blankets (like HotDog) are localized in their application, they tend to have higher thermal efficiencies and contribute less excess heat to the environment than forced air.”

In contrast, Bair Hugger “was found to have a significant disruptive impact on clean airflow patterns over the surgical site….”

AANA Journal: 96% of Bair Hugger Blowers Contaminated

August 2013

Research published in the August issue of AANA Journal revealed that 96% of Bair Hugger forced-air warming (FAW) blowers studied were generating “significant levels of contamination.”  The researchers, including two UK orthopedic surgeons, measured up to 110,000 particles per cubic foot--82,500 particles per second.  More than 70% of the blowers “had hose-end airflows with higher contamination levels than in intake airflows.”

The contaminates, therefore, were incubated inside the Bair Hugger blowers.

The problem, researchers concluded, arises from the blowers’ inadequate air filtration. Originally designed to provide 93.8% efficient intake filtration, the current-model Bair Hugger filters perform at only 63.8% efficiency.  This poor filtration, the authors stated, suggests “that inadequate FAW device intake filtration...led to a significant buildup of internal microbial contamination in the FAW blowers sampled.”