The Paradox of Forced-Air Patient Warming

Studies show that forced-air warming (FAW) reduces soft-tissue surgical infections. How can FAW be linked to increased deep-joint infections?

The paradox is easy to explain: BIOFILM.  A bacterium that lands on a prosthetic implant can secrete a coating of biofilm that protects it from both antibodies and antibiotics. Bacteria in soft-tissue cannot form effective biofilm coatings.

Secretion of biofilm allows a single airborne germ to cause a deep infection of a joint implant (Lidwell, 1983).  When the germ lands on the new implant, it protects itself in a biofilm coating and then sprouts weeks-to-months later as a catastrophic deep joint infection.  The increased airborne contamination from FAW vastly increases the chances of an airborne bacterium landing on the new implant.

In contrast, without biofilm protection, the germs in soft-tissue are susceptible to antibiotics and to an immune system activated by heat.  As a result, the creation of soft-tissue surgical infections require large inoculums of more than 100,000 germs (Elek & Cohen, 1957).

This also explains why soft-tissue surgical infections may not be increased by contaminated FAW air, while blowing even one germ into the surgical site during implant surgery can have significant negative concequences.

Watch this terrific video about bacterial biofilms 

produced by the Arthroplasty Patient Foundation:

Here is another interesting video about bacterial biofilms 

and orthopedic implants produced by the Arthroplasty Patient Foundation:

Evidence of the risks of forced-air warming just keeps growing.

A study published online ahead of print in Anesthesia & Analgesia concludes that forced-air patient warming produces waste heat that disrupts operating room ventilation airflows over the surgical site, transporting non-sterile air to the area and hindering the ventilation system’s ability to clear potential airborne contaminants.

“There are some in our industry that would like you to believe that hot air doesn’t rise,” says Dr. Scott Augustine, “this study proves, once again, that that argument is insulting to science and common sense.”

Belani, et al, focused on contamination-sensitive surgery at the University of Minnesota, using a mannequin draped for total knee replacement.  Introducing neutral buoyancy bubbles near the mannequin’s head, researchers found a significant increase in bubble-count over the surgical site when forced air warming was used, as opposed to conductive fabric or the control.  The study states:

3M accuses Augustine of "instilling fear through misleading claims." Really? Let's look at the facts...

Four independent peer reviewed studies have been published showing that forced-air patient warming devices generate convection currents that disrupt the sterile field.  One such study (McGovern, JBJS-br, 2011) even showed a 74% decrease in deep-joint infection rates after discontinuing the use of forced-air patient warming. They switched to air-free HotDog patient warming (1250 patients, 2.5 years).

Despite this strong evidence, 3M, the manufacturer of Bair Hugger® forced-air warming, has continued to obfuscate and assure the world that its forced-air warming products are universally safe.  In a recent letter to healthcare professionals, Bob Buehler, VP of 3M Patient Warming, even accuses us of “promoting a campaign designed to instill fear through misleading claims.”

To be clear: we are educating the healthcare community about a practice that puts orthopedic patients at risk for infection.  Every claim we make is backed by science and published research.  Our mission is to protect patients and to provide a safe, effective, and affordable solution. 

Evidence Growing Against Safety of Forced-air Patient Warming

Yet another peer-reviewed study—the third in the past five months—has been published showing that forced-air patient warming generates convection current activity in the vicinity of the surgical site, which could lead to contamination of the sterile field.

The study, published by Dr. Kiran Dasari in the March issue of Anaesthesia, is more evidence that a significant patient safety issue exists.  Surgeries with implanted foreign materials, like hip and knee replacements, could be greatly compromised depending on the type of warming technology used.

Another Study Shows the Risks of Using Forced-air Patient Warming

Researchers in the UK published a study in the February, 2012, issue of the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-Br examining the effects of forced-air warming on operating room airflow and surgical site sterility.

Summary:

“Forced-air warming resulted in a significant mean increase in the temperature (1.1°C vs 0.4°C, p<0.0001) and number of particles (1038.2 vs 224.8, p=0.0087) over the surgical site when compared with [HotDog®] warming, which raises concern as bacteria are known to require particles for transport.”